Package Manager : How to choose the best?

What is a package manager in the context of react-native applications

In the context of React Native applications, a package manager is a tool used to manage the dependencies and packages required for the project. React Native is built on top of JavaScript, which has a vast ecosystem of open-source libraries and packages that can be used to build applications more efficiently.

A package manager makes it easy to install, update, and manage these libraries and packages. It downloads and installs the required packages from a central repository, and manages the versioning of these packages to ensure that the application works with the correct version of each package.

The three most popular package managers in the JavaScript ecosystem are npm, yarn, and pnpm. These package managers provide a command-line interface that developers can use to install packages and manage dependencies for their projects.

Using a package manager is especially important in React Native applications because of the wide variety of dependencies and packages that are required to build a functional mobile application. It helps to simplify the process of managing these dependencies and ensures that all the required packages are available when needed.

Overall, a package manager is an essential tool for React Native developers, as it makes it easier to manage the dependencies and packages required for building mobile applications.

NPM Vs YARN Vs PNPM: Package Manager Comparison

npm, yarn, and pnpm are package managers used in the JavaScript ecosystem to manage dependencies and packages for a project. Each of them has its own pros and cons, and the choice of which one to use for a React Native mobile application depends on several factors. Here’s a brief overview of each of them:

npm	yarn	pnpm
Pros: – Comes pre-installed with Node.js, so there is no need for additional setup. – Has a large repository of packages. – Has a simple command-line interface. Cons: – It can be slow for large projects due to the way it handles dependencies. – Can have issues with version conflicts.	Pros: – Faster than npm because of its caching mechanism. – More secure with a “lockfile” to ensure consistent dependencies. – Has a simpler and more user-friendly command-line interface. Cons: – It may not be compatible with some npm packages. – Has a smaller repository of packages than npm.	Pros: – Faster than both npm and yarn because it uses a single shared folder for all packages. – Saves disk space by not duplicating packages. – Has a simpler and more user-friendly command-line interface. Cons: – It may not be compatible with some npm packages. – Has a smaller community than npm and yarn.

What to consider while choosing one package manager

When choosing between npm, yarn, and pnpm for a React Native mobile application, the following factors should be considered:

Project size: For small projects, npm may be sufficient, but for larger projects, yarn or pnpm may be better suited.
Speed: If speed is a major concern, yarn or pnpm may be a better option due to their caching mechanism and faster installation times.
Compatibility: If compatibility with all packages is important, npm may be a better option as it has a larger repository of packages.
User interface: If ease of use is a priority, yarn or pnpm may be a better option due to their simpler and more user-friendly command-line interface.

The security factors of package manager

npm, yarn, and pnpm are all designed with security in mind and have taken measures to ensure the safety of the packages they manage. Here’s a brief overview of the security features of each package manager:

npm:

Has a large repository of packages that are constantly monitored for security vulnerabilities.
Provides a mechanism for reporting and mitigating security vulnerabilities.
Uses the Node Security Platform to analyze and monitor packages for potential security issues.
Has built-in support for two-factor authentication and tokens to increase security.

yarn:

Uses a “lockfile” mechanism to ensure consistent dependencies and prevent malicious packages from being installed.
Provides a mechanism for reporting and mitigating security vulnerabilities.
Uses the Yarn Audit feature to scan packages for known vulnerabilities.
Supports two-factor authentication and tokens for increased security.

pnpm:

Uses a single shared folder for all packages to reduce duplication and increase security.
Uses a lockfile to ensure consistent dependencies and prevent malicious packages from being installed.
Provides a mechanism for reporting and mitigating security vulnerabilities.
Has built-in support for two-factor authentication and tokens to increase security.

In general, all three package managers are designed to be secure and provide mechanisms for detecting and mitigating security vulnerabilities. However, the level of security ultimately depends on the individual package and the actions taken by the developers who are using the packages.

Developers should always review and research the packages. They are using and ensuring that they come from reputable sources. They should also keep their package managers and packages up-to-date to ensure that they have the latest security patches.

In conclusion, while all three package managers have security features in place, the level of security ultimately depends on the actions taken by the developers who are using them.

Benchmark

This data is provided by https://pnpm.io/benchmarks

action	cache	lockfile	node_modules	npm	pnpm	Yarn	Yarn PnP
install				37.6s	17.7s	22.1s	20.2s
install	✔	✔	✔	2.1s	1.5s	695ms	n/a
install	✔	✔		8.9s	4.7s	8.8s	668ms
install	✔			13.4s	8.4s	22.8s	15.2s
install		✔		13.7s	14.7s	8.9s	670ms
install	✔		✔	2.6s	4s	16s	n/a
install		✔	✔	2s	1.5s	681ms	n/a
install			✔	2.6s	14.2s	16.6s	n/a
update	n/a	n/a	n/a	8.3s	7.9s	8.7s	16.9s

In conclusion, all three package managers have their own pros and cons. The choice of which one to use ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the project.